Skip to main content

Dog and Pony Show

This week I sat through several textbook presentations. The tchochkis were ok - but really nothing in NYC standards... and that's about the best thing that I can say about them. The only big difference between them was a few minor elements (extra crap for utter educator morons vs. extra crap for typical educator morons) and the presentors. Some did not rank high on the presentation skills rating chart, if you want to be polite about it.

To be honest, does it really matter which textbook is chosen? Probably not. Textbooks don't teach. Any of the choices presented would be perfectly acceptable. If they weren't, all the teachers would do their jobs and make it acceptable. I wouldn't take any textbook, plop it on a student's desk and tell them to 'read and answer the questions,' never bothering to speak them again. Even the most perfect textbook won't be perfect for everyone.

In the meantime, the state of WA is taking a break in the form of Spring Break. This morning I sat around with my coffee, bagel and newspaper - relaxing in the knowledge that I have to prepare for nothing. I ran across this article in the Sunday Seattle Times. I'm thinking I might use it when I get back for a couple of sections. The planned dancing lesson for those reading Romeo and Juliet went really well for most of the sections. I even managed to find medieval dancing music online to play while the students were tromping around. I only wish I'd had a video camera.

Comments

Jenny D. said…
Do you think that there could be a better textbook? I think that most have lots of room for improvement, but the textbook publishers are stuck in second gear. Why is that?

Also, the "extra crap" for bad teachers, I'm a fan of that because I've seen it work...but again, I wonder if the textbook people get it.

But I agree 100% that textbooks don't teach. ON the other hand, can they be part of a safety net to protect students from terrible teaching?

Popular posts from this blog

“They Don’t Get It”

I hear that a lot these days. It used to be mostly from various teens trying to negotiate the drama unfolding in their lives as they wandered into that no-man’s land between adult and child. These days it’s from adults trying to navigate the education scene these days. So many people talking and no one listening. The other day I was reading a post by a blogger I’ve been following for several years. Before there was such a thing as “blogging.” We all know spring is IEP review season. This blogger wrote about his daughter’s. Among the various elements, there was the discussion about the state assessment tests. She did not pass. There was discussion about what this means… and why said student needed to pass this test. Would she be taking a modified test? While reading, all I could think about was what would happen to that child as she entered middle school and high school. A history of not passing the assessment test vs. teachers who will now be evaluated on how many students pass t...

The Cruelest Month

I know T.S. Eliot favored April as the most cruel, but we teachers know that May is… even more so these days. Most importantly, it is the final testing month. National ‘assessments, state ‘assessments’, district ‘assessments’, school ‘assessments’… on and on. It’s impossible to actually get anything done. Toss in graduation activities, planning for the upcoming year and the 2011 bonus, lay-offs and transfers, and you have to wonder if it wouldn’t be better to save money by simply shutting down school entirely except for a few test proctors. Meanwhile, there seems an air of hopelessness permeating the education world. Plans to lay-off thousands are coming to fruition. Schools are being closed, despite protests. Charters are increasing where they can whether they should not. Unions have lost a lot ground and teachers are trying to decide if it’s even worth it any more to continue talking about education . ( not that I blame anyone for that, we all have lives to live ) For myself, I...

Campaign Promises

While purusing the Sunday paper, I came across an article describing some local candidate forum held over the weekend. Apprently they either weren't able to say a lot or what they said was pretty boring because the article was skimpy on specifics. What caught my eye was a position of Randy Dutton. He wants "higher standards for teachers." My interest was piqued... what kind of standards? In looking at his website, apparently those standards will be raised by carrying a gun to school, finally; "full days of school"-whatever that means - personally I'd love to put in business hours. No more 5 am wake ups; increasing the number of k-8 schools - because those kindergartners don't swear enough; sending disruptive students to placed like Habit for Humanity - babysitting is what people volunteer for; and teaching more American History- too bad that with all the testing, no one ever gets past the Civil War... I'm not sure how any of these apply to teachers, ...