Skip to main content

Planning Year

One of my goals this year is to really get into purposeful teaching... I know, I know. If it doesn't have a purpose why are you teaching it? But let's be honest. Anything can have a purpose if the teacher is creative enough. My mentor teacher spent three days watching "Finding Nemo" and turned it into a really great spring board for an essay topic. The students really connected with the topic she drew a parallel to and it was probably the most worked on writing assignment the entire year. I am not that good.
I posted on the English Companion Ning, looking for a planning buddy. I actually got way more replies that I thought I would. However, I have yet to really figure out the Ning technology. (You cannot believe how hard it was for me to type that... I am disgusted with myself. The fact is, I just don't have the time.) So, I'm posting what I've done so far here.
I have a lot of great ideas. Many, many great ideas and materials from others, but it just feels so disjointed to me. I'm looking for that flow... as sense that what I'm doing is really building something, learning in the students. That they leave the classroom knowing more about rhetoric, analysis, literature, etc. and not the best ways to get rid of dead bodies for future murder mystery novels that their teacher may write.
AP Language
The first week, I had the students do an assignment where they examine quotes from famous people and write a response for each quote. We discuss the quotes and talk about the classroom atmosphere. I also did a lecture with a power point on what Rhetoric is – none of the students enter the room knowing what it is. I went through

  • · Argument
  • · Rhetorical Analysis
  • · Synthesis Argument
  • · Diction
  • · Imagery
  • · Syntax
  • · Tone
  • · Denotation
  • · Connotation

Student also wrote an essay where they described a person who influenced them and made a significant impact on their life. This gave me an insight into their writing and it can be used in upcoming scholarship essays.

In the second week, I went over what annotation is and how to do it with a sample. Students practiced with a short piece. I also introduced the Rhetorical Square. For homework, students were to read “Indian Education” by Sherman Alexie and fill out the square, including lines from the text that support their ideas. The following day, they wrote an essay about adversity building character and compare the information they came up with from the text with a quote from Horace.

The students also read the first chapter of Everyday Use and worked through one of the sample arguments.

Week Three, continued with learning basic rhetorical terms. We also went over thesis writing – what a thesis is (ie. not an 12 sentence paragraph, ), what it’s is and why it never contains the words “I am going write about”. Really nuts and bolts type of stuff. I know there are exceptions to every rule, but for students who have been taught to write for the WASL exclusively for the past 10 years there are few things they have to unlearn. Or at least stop doing for awhile until they can write without that particular crutch. We also got into what Syntax is with many examples of different types. We then spent a few days using the AP Style and Rhetorical Analysis Organizer on a narrative essay. The students worked in groups in filling out the organizer and creating a visual to present their findings to the class.

This coming week will be rinse and repeat with another narrative essay. I know they can’t analyze well enough for it to become boring, but I’m always afraid that will happen. Or that I’ll miss something.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Research Based

One the biggest problems I face in working with reading intervention students is the curriculum. Or rather that lack thereof… As a part of the whole Response to Intervention (RTI) process, the only resources we are allowed to use are ones that are research based. Ones with lots of research behind them, showing that they worked on x number of students and raised their reading level by y points in z amount of time. Or that they monitor progress for x students, showing improvement based upon y test. I’d say it’s really boring, but if you’re in the business, it’s a little interesting. It is, however, not like reading anecdotal evidence. Anecdotal evidence is very interesting. It’s a story of how program x worked for teacher y and all the students became voracious readers. There’s a plot! Conflict! Possibly even movie rights! Not a lot of numbers, but a lot of touching and heartwarming sentiment.For high schools students (NOT “secondary” – which in RTI land really means 7th graders), there…

The Cruelest Month

I know T.S. Eliot favored April as the most cruel, but we teachers know that May is… even more so these days.Most importantly, it is the final testing month. National ‘assessments, state ‘assessments’, district ‘assessments’, school ‘assessments’… on and on. It’s impossible to actually get anything done. Toss in graduation activities, planning for the upcoming year and the 2011 bonus, lay-offs and transfers, and you have to wonder if it wouldn’t be better to save money by simply shutting down school entirely except for a few test proctors. Meanwhile, there seems an air of hopelessness permeating the education world. Plans to lay-off thousands are coming to fruition. Schools are being closed, despite protests. Charters are increasing where they can whether they should not. Unions have lost a lot ground and teachers are trying to decide if it’s even worth it any more to continue talking about education. (not that I blame anyone for that, we all have lives to live)For myself, I know that…

What is this RTI stuff ?

At the beginning of the school year, I and another ‘coach’ were tasked with explaining to the rest of the district staff as what RTI is… at least it got me out of the refresher course in PBIS. (and if you understood that last part, you probably don’t need to read this anyways, unless you want to correct my typos)RTI or Response to Intervention is, originally, an idea that seems very logical and student centered. Basically, any student, whether they qualify for Special Education services or not should receive instructional supports at their level. If Johnny isn’t reading, then teachers need to know why. If Johnny is being a butt-head, the teacher needs to find a way to counter that. However, if Johnny is having difficulty reading because of a skill deficit, then Johnny should get some sort of support to help him fill that deficit. If the classroom teacher can work with that, all the better. If not, then Johnny needs that support from somewhere else. Even if he is put into a Special Edu…