Skip to main content

Union Jobs

You hear a lot these days about how unions are ruining the country and we’re all going to die some horrible depression-era starvation type death because some teacher/auto line worker/grocery store clerk refused to give up his/her pension. Oddly, in this dire prediction no one ever dies because the CEO makes roughly 1000 times more than said teacher/auto line worker/grocery store clerk. They NEED that money because it’s the only way to get “a good CEO”. Apparently only CEO’s work ethic responds to monetary compensation.  Everyone else should just be grateful for a place to go every day.

So what if union jobs did go the way of the dinosaur? Would our economy suddenly jump start? Products flying off the shelves, houses snatched up by prosperous buyers, new companies starting up by the thousands? I’m guessing that it would take awhile for things to settle down and I’m not so sure it would be a happy place to live. I’m also sure that insurance rates would be out of range for most people, especially since those large groups of union employees are the ones that keep most of the large insurance companies afloat. And I’m wondering if I would just have to quit my job and home school my children since few good teachers would remain at low wages with little to no benefits. I probably will have to expand my garden as non-union grocery stores tend to have really crappy produce. In fact, I probably won’t be buying much in grocery stores at all, as the non-union ones tend to skeeve me out with their grotty-ness. (could just be my area) It’s almost too hard to imagine all the changes.

At least the politicians would have nothing left to complain about … more N*CIS marathons on TV!

Comments

Remember, though, that many states are right-to-work states---and teachers still have good benefits, etc. They also have more take home pay because they don't have dues deducted from their paycheck, not to mention that many already pay better than WA does.

Changing from a union state to a right to work state would likely not jumpstart the economy, as you point out. It merely gives teachers a choice about where to spend their dollars: on their families or on union dues.

As long as teachers choose to act like blue collar workers, they will be treated as such. When we move to professional organizations (like doctors, lawyers, and others have), we may well expect a change in how society views the field.
Jenna said…
I'm not so sure that moving from a union would magically change teaching into a "professional" career. We would still be paid by the state and tax payers. In WA state that's barely a step above welfare recipient. Wages determined by referendrum? Scary for everyone.

As for union dues, they're still cheaper than the montly insurance premium I paid as a single person in the private sector. Would saving the dues actually go into personal pockets? I wonder how many actually do the math or would just grab the "instant cash".

Popular posts from this blog

“They Don’t Get It”

I hear that a lot these days. It used to be mostly from various teens trying to negotiate the drama unfolding in their lives as they wandered into that no-man’s land between adult and child. These days it’s from adults trying to navigate the education scene these days. So many people talking and no one listening. The other day I was reading a post by a blogger I’ve been following for several years. Before there was such a thing as “blogging.” We all know spring is IEP review season. This blogger wrote about his daughter’s. Among the various elements, there was the discussion about the state assessment tests. She did not pass. There was discussion about what this means… and why said student needed to pass this test. Would she be taking a modified test? While reading, all I could think about was what would happen to that child as she entered middle school and high school. A history of not passing the assessment test vs. teachers who will now be evaluated on how many students pass t...

The Cruelest Month

I know T.S. Eliot favored April as the most cruel, but we teachers know that May is… even more so these days. Most importantly, it is the final testing month. National ‘assessments, state ‘assessments’, district ‘assessments’, school ‘assessments’… on and on. It’s impossible to actually get anything done. Toss in graduation activities, planning for the upcoming year and the 2011 bonus, lay-offs and transfers, and you have to wonder if it wouldn’t be better to save money by simply shutting down school entirely except for a few test proctors. Meanwhile, there seems an air of hopelessness permeating the education world. Plans to lay-off thousands are coming to fruition. Schools are being closed, despite protests. Charters are increasing where they can whether they should not. Unions have lost a lot ground and teachers are trying to decide if it’s even worth it any more to continue talking about education . ( not that I blame anyone for that, we all have lives to live ) For myself, I...

Campaign Promises

While purusing the Sunday paper, I came across an article describing some local candidate forum held over the weekend. Apprently they either weren't able to say a lot or what they said was pretty boring because the article was skimpy on specifics. What caught my eye was a position of Randy Dutton. He wants "higher standards for teachers." My interest was piqued... what kind of standards? In looking at his website, apparently those standards will be raised by carrying a gun to school, finally; "full days of school"-whatever that means - personally I'd love to put in business hours. No more 5 am wake ups; increasing the number of k-8 schools - because those kindergartners don't swear enough; sending disruptive students to placed like Habit for Humanity - babysitting is what people volunteer for; and teaching more American History- too bad that with all the testing, no one ever gets past the Civil War... I'm not sure how any of these apply to teachers, ...