Skip to main content

Counting Coup

I started reading Counting Coup during my reading class – good example and all that good stuff. It was one of the books suggested during my college days to help give us a multi-cultural background. While I’m wasn’t so sure about the assignment (in fact, I believe it was changed after I graduated), the book always lingered in the back of my mind. This summer the title resurfaced in a discussion about Native American texts. While I’m not sure I would characterize the book as a “Native American text”, it was a pretty good read.

Basically, the story follows a high school basketball team in a small town in Montana. Although the high school is not on a Reservation, it is located near enough that nearly half of the population is Native American.  Initially, the narrator came to the town to follow a boys basketball team and discover why almost no Native Americans end up playing after their high school career has ended. After his first trip to the nearby reservations, however, he discovers a female player of seeming mythical ability. The story moves to focus not only on the local girls basketball team, but also on this player and the relationship dynamics that affect her playing and life.

I don’t think that there was anything new I learned about Native American culture, but if you’ve never experienced it (more than just the odd powwow), you might… then again, you may become hopelessly depressed. The narrator does not mince words when describing the effects of alcoholism, racism and paternalism rampant in the culture. And unlike Sherman Alexie, there is no attempt to make it humorous. Like much of life, there is not Lifetim*eMovie happy ending. There isn’t any sugar coating – if someone’s actions are racist, then they’re labeled as racist. If it’s unfair, then the narrator says it is and trying to find out why. The  narrator constantly asks himself the question as to whether his reaction to the seemingly bad choices made by the players, coaches and others are actually bad choices or if they are simply another way of living.

I think the best part of this book is that in examining the relationships between coaches, players, family and friends, is that the reader can plainly see that there is more affecting the success of the players than just teaching of basketball skills. Despite all the coaches can do, outside factors will affect the outcome of the games, the season and the future of the players.  Is accepting that idea wrong?

And the narrator also sees that in their school careers also… many of the teachers do what they can, but in end some times it’s just not enough. While they may accept outcomes that are likely, it does not mean that they are not sympathetic their students lives or that they do not want them to succeed. There is a conversation between a French teacher and the narrator wherein the French teacher is not pleased that the school board is pushing for the school to offer Crow language courses. When asked why French was the more important class, the teacher replies that French will help them in the business world. I know the book was written a decade ago, but the last time I think French was necessity for business was a while ago. Does the teacher truly believe this or is the she trying to protect something she loves or  is it a bias against the Native American language? Probably a mixture of all three. The narrator doesn’t go into the implications of this conversation for the students, but it something to think about when reading.

That is something that I need to remember for my students as well. I can “want” them to do well and graduate and go onto college, but if they make a different choice, it doesn’t necessarily mean it’s “bad”. It doesn’t mean that I don’t continue to try to prepare them the best that I know how to, for the future, but it does mean that sometimes I have to trust that they might have a better view of their own picture than I do. Despite the obstacles the players face during their season, and for their futures, their lives go on. For the most part the book does end on a positive note. Some times it’s not what the reader expected, but that’s ok too.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

“They Don’t Get It”

I hear that a lot these days. It used to be mostly from various teens trying to negotiate the drama unfolding in their lives as they wandered into that no-man’s land between adult and child. These days it’s from adults trying to navigate the education scene these days. So many people talking and no one listening. The other day I was reading a post by a blogger I’ve been following for several years. Before there was such a thing as “blogging.” We all know spring is IEP review season. This blogger wrote about his daughter’s. Among the various elements, there was the discussion about the state assessment tests. She did not pass. There was discussion about what this means… and why said student needed to pass this test. Would she be taking a modified test? While reading, all I could think about was what would happen to that child as she entered middle school and high school. A history of not passing the assessment test vs. teachers who will now be evaluated on how many students pass t...

The Cruelest Month

I know T.S. Eliot favored April as the most cruel, but we teachers know that May is… even more so these days. Most importantly, it is the final testing month. National ‘assessments, state ‘assessments’, district ‘assessments’, school ‘assessments’… on and on. It’s impossible to actually get anything done. Toss in graduation activities, planning for the upcoming year and the 2011 bonus, lay-offs and transfers, and you have to wonder if it wouldn’t be better to save money by simply shutting down school entirely except for a few test proctors. Meanwhile, there seems an air of hopelessness permeating the education world. Plans to lay-off thousands are coming to fruition. Schools are being closed, despite protests. Charters are increasing where they can whether they should not. Unions have lost a lot ground and teachers are trying to decide if it’s even worth it any more to continue talking about education . ( not that I blame anyone for that, we all have lives to live ) For myself, I...

Campaign Promises

While purusing the Sunday paper, I came across an article describing some local candidate forum held over the weekend. Apprently they either weren't able to say a lot or what they said was pretty boring because the article was skimpy on specifics. What caught my eye was a position of Randy Dutton. He wants "higher standards for teachers." My interest was piqued... what kind of standards? In looking at his website, apparently those standards will be raised by carrying a gun to school, finally; "full days of school"-whatever that means - personally I'd love to put in business hours. No more 5 am wake ups; increasing the number of k-8 schools - because those kindergartners don't swear enough; sending disruptive students to placed like Habit for Humanity - babysitting is what people volunteer for; and teaching more American History- too bad that with all the testing, no one ever gets past the Civil War... I'm not sure how any of these apply to teachers, ...