Skip to main content

What is this RTI stuff ?

At the beginning of the school year, I and another ‘coach’ were tasked with explaining to the rest of the district staff as what RTI is… at least it got me out of the refresher course in PBIS. (and if you understood that last part, you probably don’t need to read this anyways, unless you want to correct my typos)

RTI or Response to Intervention is, originally, an idea that seems very logical and student centered. Basically, any student, whether they qualify for Special Education services or not should receive instructional supports at their level. If Johnny isn’t reading, then teachers need to know why. If Johnny is being a butt-head, the teacher needs to find a way to counter that. However, if Johnny is having difficulty reading because of a skill deficit, then Johnny should get some sort of support to help him fill that deficit. If the classroom teacher can work with that, all the better. If not, then Johnny needs that support from somewhere else. Even if he is put into a Special Education class! *gasp*

RTI is also a system. It is a data driven system. It’s also a tiered system.RtI_Pyramid It’s a system because it’s easier to plug everyone into their little category if you have a system. However, their categorization can change over the year, so they’re not stuck in that category for an extended period of time. Hopefully.

Tier 1 are those students who are have grade appropriate skills. They are where they should be for that grade level. This should be approximately 80% of the population of a school. If this is less than 80%, it may indicate a problem with your core curriculum or with the fidelity of that curriculum (fidelity means that the curriculum is being presented as it was intended to be according the publisher). It could also mean that you have a school full of students with skill deficits and everyone needs to be teaching interventions in the core instruction – not separate intervention instruction.

Tier 2 are those students who show some sort of skill deficit. They are not at grade level. They are not, however, very far below grade level. If you are familiar with WASL/HSPE lingo, they are level two students. The most common term for them I’ve found on RTI materials is that they are “at-risk”.  It never goes into detail of what they are “at-risk” of… but I like to think of this group as those students in your class who you know just don’t get it, but probably enough life skills to get by. This should be approximately 5 to 15% of the entire student population.

Tier 3 are those who have definite skill deficits. It’s pretty obvious to the teacher that something is not clicking. These tend to be students with identified learning difficulties or language issues. This is expected to be under 5% of the total student population.

These percentages are guidelines to a certain extent. In lower elementary grades the percentage of level two students will be much, much higher than in high school, for example. Schools with a very large immigrant population will have a higher percentage of level three students and that may change seasonally if there is a large migrant population. It’s my personal opinion that the tiers exist to help determine what working and what isn’t. Your mileage may vary.

Labels:

Comments

Holly G said…
Very nice breakdown of RTI in laymen's terms. I teach 2nd grade and just as you stated, our percentages of Tier 2 students tend to be higher, but usually most of those kiddos make great improvements with a year or two of daily interventions. Also, I always get a kick out of how "Johnny" is always the default name we use. :)
7:53 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

“They Don’t Get It”

I hear that a lot these days. It used to be mostly from various teens trying to negotiate the drama unfolding in their lives as they wandered into that no-man’s land between adult and child. These days it’s from adults trying to navigate the education scene these days. So many people talking and no one listening. The other day I was reading a post by a blogger I’ve been following for several years. Before there was such a thing as “blogging.” We all know spring is IEP review season. This blogger wrote about his daughter’s. Among the various elements, there was the discussion about the state assessment tests. She did not pass. There was discussion about what this means… and why said student needed to pass this test. Would she be taking a modified test? While reading, all I could think about was what would happen to that child as she entered middle school and high school. A history of not passing the assessment test vs. teachers who will now be evaluated on how many students pass t...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Cruelest Month

I know T.S. Eliot favored April as the most cruel, but we teachers know that May is… even more so these days. Most importantly, it is the final testing month. National ‘assessments, state ‘assessments’, district ‘assessments’, school ‘assessments’… on and on. It’s impossible to actually get anything done. Toss in graduation activities, planning for the upcoming year and the 2011 bonus, lay-offs and transfers, and you have to wonder if it wouldn’t be better to save money by simply shutting down school entirely except for a few test proctors. Meanwhile, there seems an air of hopelessness permeating the education world. Plans to lay-off thousands are coming to fruition. Schools are being closed, despite protests. Charters are increasing where they can whether they should not. Unions have lost a lot ground and teachers are trying to decide if it’s even worth it any more to continue talking about education . ( not that I blame anyone for that, we all have lives to live ) For myself, I...
Post a Comment
Read more

Campaign Promises

While purusing the Sunday paper, I came across an article describing some local candidate forum held over the weekend. Apprently they either weren't able to say a lot or what they said was pretty boring because the article was skimpy on specifics. What caught my eye was a position of Randy Dutton. He wants "higher standards for teachers." My interest was piqued... what kind of standards? In looking at his website, apparently those standards will be raised by carrying a gun to school, finally; "full days of school"-whatever that means - personally I'd love to put in business hours. No more 5 am wake ups; increasing the number of k-8 schools - because those kindergartners don't swear enough; sending disruptive students to placed like Habit for Humanity - babysitting is what people volunteer for; and teaching more American History- too bad that with all the testing, no one ever gets past the Civil War... I'm not sure how any of these apply to teachers, ...
Post a Comment
Read more